Radio – National-Socialist Worldview

Radio Enoch on Karl Marx

Hadding — Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:28:00 +0000

In this segment from Radio Enoch‘s broadcast of 2 November 1979 the narrator gives examples of Karl Marx’ hypocrisy as a supposed champion of the working class.

National-Socialist criticism of Marx goes far beyond noting the hypocrisy in Marx’s personal life, suggesting that Marxism represents phony leftism, a deliberate misdirection and sabotage of the workers’ movement. The conservatives who put on Radio Enoch were most likely not even interested in a question such as that. See The Fraud of Marxism.

Upload MP3 and download MP3 using free MP3 hosting.

Radio Enoch: A British Nationalist Clandestine Broadcaster of the 1970s

Hadding — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:45:00 +0000

This unlicensed “right-wing wireless” station broadcast in 1978-1979, and even attracted the attention of newspapers.

A front-page article from The Observer, 18 March 1979

Listen to Undated Broadcast.

Listen to Broadcast of 2 November 1979.

Story of Radio Enoch.

Like The Voice of Tomorrow in the USA, Radio Enoch’s programs were very well done, passable as professional broadcasting, except that the speakers on Radio Enoch all spoke in a West-Midlands accent rather than what used to be the standard BBC pronunciation.

The station of course was named after Enoch Powell, a conservative politician from the West Midlands best known for his Rivers of Blood speech in opposition to continued non-White immigration.

The broadcast includes discussion of the following:

1. Immigration of Hindus and Muslims creates problems with food in public schools.

2. Rhodesia: the situation is unstable because of conflict among “tribes,” among whom the White Man had been the source of order and stability.

3. The need to curb the power of trade unions (discussion followed by anti-union song).

4. Praise of anti-Communist dictator Augusto Pinochet.

5. Complaint about opposition to nuclear power by ecologists, merging into a counter-accusation about overpopulation: “People are the pollutants.”

I love the quality of the broadcast, and the material is interesting, better than anything that we get from “conservative” media today — but that isn’t saying much. The ideology presented by Radio Enoch is quite flawed.

Critique

Radio Enoch on Race

Radio Enoch and The Voice of Tomorrow are both explicitly concerned with race, but while The Voice of Tomorrow focuses entirely on race, Radio Enoch calls itself “right-wing” and puts race on the same footing as some other issues. Radio Enoch seems to have been perhaps even more concerned about labor unions than about race.

Also, the way Radio Enoch discusses race is not as direct as the discussion on The Voice of Tomorrow. Radio Enoch doesn’t confront the listener with the worst aspects of multiracialism and ask, “Whatcha gonna do, Whitey?” (Which was more or less Enoch Powell’s approach in the powerful Rivers of Blood speech.) Instead they have a woman bemoaning the complications of arranging school-lunches for Hindus and Muslims. Between these two clandestine political broadcasters you can discern the difference between conservative racism (such as it was in the 1970s) and race-radicalism.

Radio Enoch on Jews

The most telling moment comes in the interview with “a well known personality from southeast Africa” when the personality says that we need “to understand who our real enemies are.” In other words, we have apparent enemies, and real enemies, somebody pulling the strings behind them.

The interviewer asks, “Whom do you believe them to be?”

The well-known personality responds: “Well they could be a conglomerate of the Marxists, Internationalists, and people who seek to govern through the medium of greed and power.”

That is not a straight answer. A real, straightforward answer from a man that knows “who our real enemies are” does not begin with “Well they could be.” Apparently the listeners are supposed to decipher his circumlocution to figure out that he means Jews. Our real enemies are, you know — nudge nudge, wink wink — reptilians perhaps. It’s questionable how many people are really getting the point there.

Radio Enoch on Labor-Unions

The hostility of “true conservatism” toward organized labor was, I think, probably self-defeating.

Unionized workers mass-demonstrated in support of Enoch Powell.

Right-wing anti-unionism may have harmed the anti-immigration cause in Britain, since much of the groundswell of support for Enoch Powell’s anti-immigration stance came from unionized White laborers, e.g. dockers and meat-porters. This kind of internal contradiction is the weakness of national-liberalism, in contrast to national-socialism.

The Slide into Kosher Conservatism

When the Jewish problem is never stated clearly, and when multiracialism is presented in terms of difficulties of implementation rather than as something unwanted in itself, and when it’s all mixed with anti-Marxism and anti-unionism, the possibility of gradually pushing racial concerns out of conservative discourse entirely is obvious. With Jews gaining a foothold in “conservative” media during and since the 197os (and being all-too-eagerly received), that is what has happened. We have reached the point now that so-called conservatives will even accuse someone of being un-conservative if he tries to raise one of these neglected topics.

The Voice of Tomorrow: a White-Racialist Clandestine Broadcaster of a Quarter-Century Ago

Hadding — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:28:00 +0000

The Voice of Tomorrow was an unlicensed mediumwave and shortwave station of the late 1970s and 80s that achieved a certain notoriety with occasional* broadcasts. This particular recording was made by a listener to a broadcast on 1616kHz AM on 10 March 1985.

The risks involved in do-it-yourself radio broadcasting were, potentially, a $10,000 fine and a year in prison, although in practice the penalty tended to be a fine of less than $1000, and confiscation of equipment.

This is the kind of extreme to which people were driven to try to get out a message of truth prior to the proliferation of Internet and podcasts, since it was very difficult to find a licensed station that would air pro-White programming, and in any case expensive — not like Internet podcasting now, whereby anyone can reach thousands of people at very little cost.

Even though such erratic broadcasts were heard by relatively few people, it was inspiring to hear, or read in Popular Communications, that somebody was doing such a thing.

Who did this?

There has been speculation that Kevin Strom, a former broadcast engineer for The Voice of America who later created the American Dissident Voices radio program, may have been behind Voice of Tomorrow. The Wikipedia article about Strom even affirms this, alleging his insane first wife as the source. When I asked Strom about it in 1993, however, he denied any connection, and I have to say that the voices in the recording sound not a bit like him.

The self-identification, “White American Resistance Information Network,” indicates that Voice of Tomorrow was put on not by Kevin Strom but by somebody associated with Tom Metzger, since White American Resistance is a name that Metzger used, later changed to White Aryan Resistance.

The quality of the production, judging by this small sample, seems to have been quite good. It might be worthwhile if the possessor of the original studio recordings would digitize them and make them available on Internet.

____________________________
* It is impossible to maintain a consistent broadcast schedule on “AM” or shortwave at any significant wattage without attracting a visit from the Federal Communications Commission. Unlicensed broadcasting on FM was always much safer than on medium and shortwave. The FCC has always paid much less attention to FM pirates, probably because the signal at those frequencies generally crosses no state-boundary (and thus is arguably not under Federal jurisdiction), and certainly has no effect on international broadcast agreements. With the Reagan Administration’s cuts to the FCC’s budget, flagrant regular unlicensed FM broadcasting grew in the 1980s, and again in the 1990s. The prevalent theory about prosecution of unlicensed broadcasters on FM is that it is a very low priority for the FCC and only gains priority if the FCC receives complaints: of course a broadcaster with a racial message is very likely to become the target of complaints.

** The recording comes from “Mike Brooker’s DX Dharma.”

Upload MP3 and download MP3 using free MP3 hosting from Tindeck.

George Lincoln Rockwell vs. the English Pansy

Hadding — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:00 +0000

Some people are direct and say what they mean. Others find ways to be odious while remaining formally gentle and polite.

Hear a ten minute clip of George Lincoln Rockwell’s 9 May 1965 appearance on Michael Jackson’s talkshow on KNX Los Angeles.

There is a clash of worldviews evident in the give-and-take. Although Rockwell identifies himself as White and Christian, his views are clearly influenced by Darwinism. He rejects the term “human being” as an absolute category but rather sees man as part of nature with some types of man being less human than others. Instead of divinely ordained categories, Rockwell sees a natural continuum: “I say there’s no sharp line.”

The objections that Jackson and some callers raise to Rockwell’s racial views are all ultimately rooted in the Bible. One caller asks how Rockwell feels that he is to credit for having been born White: the assumption is that he could have been born some other way, which presumes that soul and body are independent, a kind of ghost-in-the-machine relationship. Jackson’s rhetorical exploitation of the category “human being” is also based on an implicit creationism, although arch-liberal Jackson surely is not consciously creationist.

Jackson seems to be sufficiently clever that he probably understands that his rhetoric is specious, for example when he asserts that Karl Marx was not a Jew simply because he did not practice the Jewish religion. Jackson was surely not so ignorant as to be unaware of secular Jews.

Jackson probably also understands very well that the 65% of California voters who supported Proposition 14 (1963), which nullified the Rumford Fair Housing Act, were racially motivated. They did not want to be required to rent and sell property to Blacks. Jackson pretends to accept at face-value the constitutionalist rhetoric used to argue for the Proposition so that he can avoid admitting that many Californians share Rockwell’s preference for not associating with Blacks.

Michael Jackson’s lack of concern for reality is so complete that he advocates trying to make Blacks equal to Whites even if Blacks are inherently inferior, taking no account of the burden and deprivation to White people that such an effort entails. Only a White man so privileged that he does not have to deal with the consequences of what he advocates, and so self-serving that he lacks any sense of responsibility to less wealthy members of his own race, could take such a position.

Leftist-dominated Wikipedia says that Jackson “was never accused of being rude,” but you can hear Rockwell accusing Jackson precisely of being rude when he says, “Maybe I ought to do that; maybe I ought to cut you out more,” referring to Jackson’s hanging up on a caller.

Jackson retorts, “Try it.”

Maybe it’s only a coincidence that this happened in September of the same year.

The whole station was in effect cut off when its tower’s guywires were cut by a pair of mischief-makers (spotted running from the scene) and the station was forced to operate on a makeshift, long-wire antenna at drastically reduced power for the following year, losing who knows how much advertising revenue, in addition to the costs of erecting a new tower.

While I do not believe that Rockwell would have ordered such a deed, I would not be even slightly surprised if a couple of his adherents, annoyed with Jackson’s outrageous (especially for 1965) advocacy of racial equality, undertook it of their own accord. The perpetrators were never caught.