Trisha producer Alyson DiFranco

Recently White racial activist Craig Cobb appeared on NBC’s Trisha show, where another guest, neurotic mulatto Herman Williams III (brother of Montel Williams) asserted that everybody in the entire world had Negro ancestors and therefore carried Negro DNA. This is an absurd claim. But the absurd claim was subsequently supported by the even more absurd claim that Trisha’s producer, the pink-skinned and fine-featured Alyson DiFranco, had been shown by a genetic test to have 19% “Subsaharan” DNA. Everybody of course understood “Subsaharan” to mean Negro. That is how it was meant to be understood. “Subsaharan” had to be taken to mean Negro, because otherwise Herman Williams’ claim would not have been validated.

Based on her general appearance, it is practically impossible that Miss DiFranco has anywhere near 19% Negro genes. Any old-fashioned White person from the South would have laughed at this claim, because we know (as Madison Grant observed a century ago in The Passing of the Great Race) that a person that is half-Black and half-White looks completely Black, and it is only after many generations of dilution that Negroid characteristics cease to be detectable. At 19% Negro Miss DiFranco would be an obvious mulatta. Since she is far from that, an appropriate response to that imputation would have been something along the lines of: I may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night.

For some reason though — maybe he was still thinking about the cleavage that Miss DiFranco had displayed while interviewing him in Leith — Craig Cobb evidently did not suspect anything rotten, and, when the host asked him to submit to a DNA test like that taken by Miss DiFranco, Mr. Cobb agreed to it. Predictably, they announced that Craig Cobb had some “Subsaharan” genes too — although only 14% in his case.

What’s going on here? Are they making it up?

Most likely the claim of “Subsaharan DNA” is a half-truth, calculated to give the unwary public a false impression. The word “Subsaharan,” is not a racial term. It is a geographic term.

Since prehistoric times there have been people of White ancestry in Africa. These are the Berbers and their mixed-race descendants, who are found especially in Somalia (which is geographically Subsaharan) and Morocco, but also to some extent throughout eastern and northern Africa. Most Berbers today are mongrelized, but some only to a slight degree. Especially those Berbers living within the seclusion of  mountain-ranges often retain even today the blue eyes and blond hair of their ancestors, who migrated from Europe into Africa during the Ice Age.

A Moroccan Berber family.

The fact that most people do not know the extent and antiquity of White heritage in Africa has been exploited for propaganda-purposes before.  In 2010 Belgian journalist Jean-Paul Mulders insinuated that Adolf Hitler had some Negro ancestry based on the fact that he carried a Y-chromosome that is also carried by some people in Africa. So as not to defeat his own propaganda, Mulders omitted to mention that the same Y-chromosome has a substantial presence in Europe, especially in the Balkans. The deception consisted in pretending that White DNA found in both Europe and Africa was really Negro DNA that somehow made its way into Europe (magically, without bringing any observable Negroid characteristics with it).

My guess is that this is the kind of game that the Trisha show is playing. 
________________
* It seems necessary to show such an illustration of a typical one-eighth Negro for clarification, because many Americans today seem not to realize how dilute is the Negro ancestry of the “African Americans” that they regularly see on television. When an octoroon on television is called “African American” and then through further mixing produces a child that can pass for White (to the unobservant) and is erroneously called “half-Black,” the public gets a falsely optimistic picture of how easy it might be for Negroid characteristics to be bred out.

This map shows the distribution of the Y-chromosome that a news-item in the Daily Mail is claiming demonstrates that Hitler was descended from Blacks and Jews. Really!

The article says, “A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b (Y-DNA) in their samples is rare in Germany and indeed Western Europe.” Rare? According to the color-coding of this map, this chromosome is carried by a minority (5-10%) of men in Germany and Austria, but is not rare.  In any case it is much more common a little farther south in the Balkans. It seems to occur in more than 25% of the male population along parts of the Adriatic coast. This chromosome is not even close to being confined to either Africans or Jews.

The fact that Hitler carried a mutated Y-chromosome that is also carried by 18-20% of Ashkenazi Jews and by mixed-race people from some coastal regions of Africa does not even begin to imply that Hitler is descended from either Negroes or Jews. Note that the chromosome becomes generally less common with distance from the north and northeast coasts of Africa, and has little to no presence in the heart of Africa where pure Negroes can be found: the implication is that the chromosome was brought to Africa by people who arrived by sea from the neighboring continents. Jews may carry any Y-chromosome, since Jewish ethnicity is based on that of the mother, not the father.  This imputation about Adolf Hitler’s ancestry is bad journalism and junk science, preying on the ignorance of the reading public.

Two years ago the same journalist who published this claim, Jean-Paul Mulders, published the conclusion that Hitler did not have a Jewish paternal grandfather as had been rumored.*  The fact that Hitler shares identical Y-dna with other Hitlers and Hiedlers and Huettlers proves it. Here is the summation from a Belgian news source, dated 25 August 2008:

Hitler n’avait pas de sang juif et pas de fils en France, indique une enquête de Jean-Paul Mulders, journaliste au quotidien flamand Het Laatste Nieuws. Mulders est parvenu à déconstruire ces deux mythes grâce à des enquêtes ADN. Le journaliste s’est rendu en Autriche et aux Etats-Unis et est parvenu à obtenir des échantillons ADN des membres de la famille de l’ancien Führer. Le chromosome Y des échantillons autrichiens et américains semble parfaitement correspondre, ce qui signifie que Hitler était bel et bien un Hitler et que la rumeur selon laquelle il avait un grand-père juif et qu’il était un bâtard est fausse.[source: DH.be]

Translation:

Hitler had no Jewish blood and no son in France, indicates an investigation by Jean-Paul Mulders, journalist for the Flemish daily Het Laatste Nieuws. Mulders was able to deconstruct these two myths thanks to DNA testing. The journalist went to Austria and the United States and was able to obtain DNA samples of members of the old Fuehrer’s family. The Y-chromosomes of the Austrian and American samples seem to match perfectly, which means that Hitler was well and truly Hitler and that the rumor according to which he had a Jew as a grandfather and that he was illegitimate is false.**

Maybe Mulders is trying to make amends to the powers that be with his current tenuous effort to restore doubt about Hitler’s racial forebears.

___________________________________

* This was an unintended consequence of Mulders’ investigation of the claim by a Frenchman named Jean Loret that he was Hitler’s illegitimate son.

** It was Alois Hitler who was born out of wedlock, but his father Johann Georg Hiedler married his mother Maria Schicklgruber when Alois was only five years old; many years later Alois had his legitimacy formalized before a parish priest. The rumor, mentioned (and dismissed) in David Irving’s Hitler’s War, that Adolf Hitler himself was born illegitimate, is an obvious corruption of that story.
]]> https://national-socialist-worldview.com/2010/08/24/hitler-had-no-jewish-grandfathernbsp-and-he-wasnt-part-negro-either-you-nut/feed/ 0